The Modern CFO: The CFOs role in preparing a business for exit

This issue features insights from CFOs and industry leaders including Carla Stent, Rufus Meakin and Alice Tsang. Together, they explore the evolving role of the CFO in technology-led businesses and the challenges shaping modern finance leadership in preparing a business for exit.

From the Desk of Wayne Boorer, CFO at RCK Partners.

Wayne Boorer (ACMA)
Chief Financial Officer, MLRO and Partner

This edition builds on many of the themes we explored in our first issue, where we looked at the CFO's expanding influence beyond traditional finance and into strategy, innovation and long-term value creation. The feedback we received reinforced something that has become increasingly clear: today's CFO is expected not only to report on performance, but to help shape the future direction of the business.

In this second edition of The Modern CFO, we turn our attention to preparing a business for exit. Whether the end goal is private equity investment, a trade sale, an IPO or simply creating a stronger and more resilient business, the foundations fora successful outcome are laid years before any transaction takes place.

Throughout this issue, we hear from experienced CFOs, advisers and business leaders who have navigated growth, investment and exit processes first hand. Their perspectives highlight the importance of aligning financial performance with value creation, building robust processes, reducing risk, strengthening cash flow and creating a compelling story that stands up to scrutiny during due diligence.

We also explore the findings of our latest CFO research into the UK's R&D tax relief regime. While innovation remains a key driver of growth for technology-led businesses, our survey reveals growing concerns around the reliability and predictability of R&D incentives. Given the role these incentives can play in supporting growth, profitability and ultimately business value, this is an issue that deserves close attention from finance leaders.

In the last 5 years, what, if anything, have delays or uncertainty in receiving R&D tax relief payments led your business to do? (Select all that apply)

R&D tax credits: commentary from Rufus Meakin & Paul Rosser

Rufus Meakin headshot
Rufus Meakin
Senior Advisor and Brand Ambassador
Paul Rosser headshot
Paul Rosser
Partner

R&D incentives represent a powerful and often underutilised lever of value creation. As a source of non-dilutive funding, R&D tax credits improve EBITDA and enhance value at exit.

RCK Partners recently commissioned independent research, conducted by Censuswide, surveying 254 CFOs from R&D-active SMEs to explore the impact of recent R&D tax relief reforms on UK SMEs. This research was featured by The Times, provides a comprehensive assessment of how these changes are affecting innovative businesses across the UK. The data was concerning and showed that 72% of UK CFOs surveyed consider the time HMRC takes to process and pay R&D claims makes the relief too unreliable to factor into their financial planning.

For technology-led businesses, R&D Tax Credits can represent a significant source of funding and contribute to the cash available to invest in further growth. But as a business moves towards investment or exit, the importance of its R&D claims goes beyond the value of the relief itself. Historic R&D Tax Credit claims may come under scrutiny as part of the due diligence process. Buyers and investors will want to understand whether claims have been prepared robustly, whether the underlying R&D and expenditure can be properly evidenced and whether there are any potential liabilities or HMRC risks that could emerge after a transaction.

Where concerns are identified, an acquirer may seek warranties or indemnities from the seller against potential liabilities arising from historic claims. More significant issues could potentially affect the terms of the transaction itself.

Who prepared the claims, and how they were prepared, can therefore become important. A buyer or investor may take greater comfort from knowing that claims have been prepared to a high professional standard, supported by appropriate technical and financial evidence and, where an enquiry has arisen, handled by advisors with a strong track record of dealing with HMRC.

Not claiming R&D Tax Credits can also raise questions. If an R&D-intensive technology business has never made a claim, an investor or trade acquirer may reasonably want to understand why. There may be a perfectly good explanation, but where a business has invested significantly in developing new or improved technology, its historic R&D Tax Credit position should be consistent with the underlying R&D activity.

There may also be value that has been missed in historic claims. A business may have been overly cautious or failed to identify all qualifying projects or expenditure. Reviewing previous claims before a transaction can help identify whether legitimate opportunities have been overlooked.

The key is not to treat R&D Tax Credits as an isolated annual tax exercise. For an R&D-intensive business, its claims form part of the wider financial and technical story presented to potential investors and acquirers. The claims, the underlying R&D activity and the company's wider technology story should stand up to scrutiny together.

As with so much of exit preparation, the best time to establish whether your R&D Tax Credit position is robust is long before a potential buyer starts asking the questions.

Commentary from RCK Partners Innovation Advisory Council

Carla Stent
RCK Advisor (as a Consultant on behalf of MCS Advisory Ltd), and Former Partner & COO at Virgin, Deputy CFO at Barclays Retail and Commercial Bank; NED at Utility Warehouse, Evelyn Partners and HBX Group plc

Drawing on her experience across corporate finance, private equity, IPOs and business exits, Carla Stent shared her perspective on what distinguishes businesses that attract premium valuations from those that don't. Carla focused on what happened after an exit after noticing that often, the deal did not seem to deliver the benefits. Carla after preparing a business for exit then also became focused on post-merger integration and value creation. From large organisations to scale ups and start-ups, Carla has an appreciation of value creation and having a meaningful exit strategy from the position as a CFO.  

· My advice is to always start with the end in mind. Too many businesses only focus on value creation when an exit is on the horizon. The strongest outcomes come from building a business that is attractive to buyers’ years before a transaction is considered. So often this only becomes a conversation at exit. This is often somewhat too late, and finance are creating the data and narrative retrospectively.

· Profit alone doesn't determine value and buyers look beyond revenue and EBITDA to assess risk. Over-reliance on key customers, founders, employees or infrastructure can significantly reduce valuation and create challenges during due diligence. I have seen this very often in financial services, where there is often a key dependency on the rainmakers, or in entrepreneurial businesses where the founder is instrumental to the company’s success.

· Focus on the '3 Ds' of value creation: Data, Diversity and Drivers. Clean, accessible data, diversified revenue streams and a clear understanding of value drivers such as customer retention, recurring revenue, cash conversion and customer concentration all contribute to a stronger business.  

· The most effective CFOs move beyond reporting historical performance and lead conversations about what is making the business more valuable over time which brings us back to creating value. Anyone can grow a business but exceptional CFOs help to build businesses that buyers compete to own.  

5 minutes with a modern CFO…

Alice Tsang
Independent fractional CFO, specialising in FinTech

1. Looking back, what do you wish you had done differently three years before the exit process began? 

There are always a lot of things you wish you'd done differently. One of the main things would have been to get the leadership team thinking about the exit before an exit trigger, and what that means for operational decision-making. As a business, you need time to decide the story you want to tell rather than having to justify the story you ended up with, and you ideally you want to be in a position to control the narrative.  

I would also have made the five-year plan much more visible in decision-making. Often the five-year plan is a document that gets dusted down annually and revised, but the plan is actually your business story. You need to understand if there is a disconnect between this and what people do day-to-day and if so, why, as this becomes very important when you're sitting in front of a potential buyer.

Additionally, I'd have put greater emphasis on sustainable cash flow growth, because ultimately this is creates sustainable value growth. Businesses tend to focus on targets such as revenue, EBITDA, and customer acquisition, but ultimately, you need to understand what is really driving the growth in the value in of the business. I'd therefore put much more emphasis on KPIs such as cash flow and return on invested capital.  

Most teams within a business understand things like market share and revenue growth. Both of these add value, but for value to be sustainable, you've got to go deeper than that. For example, how much is the businesses revenue recurring? Is it concentrated between one or two customers, or a handful of customers or is it diversified? It's all about risk, and sustainable value means reducing the risk associated with those future cashflows because, ultimately, the valuation of a company is based largely on its projected cash flows.

Also if the exit plan plays a bigger is part of the management meetings or a bigger part, it focuses the leadership team on what actually drives value creation. A lot of management discussions are about, "How do we grow this?" or "How do we grow that?" But if you don't link those decisions back to how they create value, different parts of the business can start heading down different paths. Again, all of that eventually comes out during due diligence. A lot of time can be taken up retrospectively explaining justifying whys one thing happened, rather than how it fits in the overall story already having the information and explanation to hand.That can suck up a lot of resources because, at the same time, when going through the due diligence process, you're still running the business. Minimising the impact of due diligence on the day-to-day business is there fore really important.

One other thing I wish had happened differently is that I'd been brought into the business earlier, so that I could have put influenced more of this in place beforehand and helped to shape things. That's actually quite a common problem inthat businesses often don't have a CFO early enough and only bring one in when they think they need one, usually when anexit has already been triggered. prior to the set-up already being done. Inaddition, Thinking about your exit early on, it means that you can start to prepare early. It helps you shape how you manage your financial andoperational processes, which can help minimise the amount of data cleaning retrospectively. If you're doing all those things up front, there's a much lesswork to be done at the point of due diligence

2. What were the metrics or indicators that you focused on improving the increased attractiveness of the business? 

One of the most important areas to focus on is cash flow. In my experience, it is often one of the least understood metrics across a leadership team. Many of the C-Suite view cash flow as solely primarily the CFO's responsibility, assuming that as long as they are getting paid and there is money in the bank, everything is fine. In reality, cash flow is a business-wide issue, and a key indicator of value, resilience, sustainability, and cash allows the business to have options.

To make cash flow more tangible, I usually ask the rest of the leadership team to focus on the factors that influence it. Customer concentration is a good example that I use. Businesses that rely heavily on a small number of customers carry significant risk, as the loss of a single client can have a huge impact on revenue and cash. If this is the case, I'd advise businesses to diversify their customer base from a risk perspective.

Recurring revenue is another important indicator. Businesses with predictable, contract-based revenue streams are generally viewed more favourably by investors and acquirers because they provide greater visibility of future cash flows. Where possible, businesses should look for opportunities to increase recurring income through products or contracts that enhance this. It is equally important to understand the cost of acquiring and servicing customers. I'd advise leadership teams should look beyond the headline revenue figures and assess how much time,resource and investment is required to win and maintain each client relationship. Some clients require more resources than others, and this is important to know to understand where the cash is coming from, to help the leadership team know where to focus theirs and their businesses efforts.

Beyond financial performance, succession planning is another area that is frequently overlooked, and in my experience in working with SMEs, many can be most are very founder centric. This then poses a is obviously a risk as to if something happens to the founder or when if they step away for from the business, this can be detrimental as they are usually heavily involved and the core decision maker. Building a broader leadership team, delegating responsibilities and hiring in necessary the skills can help reduce this dependency on one person the founder and to makes the business more attractive to buyers.  

Finally, a piece of advice is to address operational issues asap to prevent them becoming long-term problems as these can compound and then be flagged during the buying process. Matters Issues such as aged debtors, contract disputes, compliance concerns or unresolved tax issues can linger for years if they are not prioritised. Just close these issues, because these are all potential red flags. which you want and you want to minimise these red flags as much as possible. While these issues may appear as minor during the day-to-day, they often attract disproportionate attention during a due diligence process. A relatively small bad debt or compliance issue, for example, can generate a lot of questions about why it arose, how it was dealt with, and why it is still there. Owners do not want to spend additional time addressing preventable concerns during a transaction. Dealing with these issues in advance helps minimise red flags, reduces disruption during due diligence process, and puts the business in a stronger position when engaging with potential buyers.

3. What surprised you most during the due diligence process?

The biggest surprise for me was how intense the process is. In the exit I was involved with, I was the sole person answering the due diligence questions related to finance and financial processes.

I hadn't appreciated just how many hundreds of questions there would be and the forensic evidence must to be provided. It seemed almost feltlike each answer  question generated more questions another. For example, if they ask whether you've had any tax issues and you say no, effectively the response is: show me the proof. R&D Tax Credit claims were part of that process as well and our buyers wanted to seethe documentation behind the claims and understand how they had been prepared which makes it important to seek expert advice as all of a company's financials will fall under scrutiny during the buying process. 

Due diligence can also be a significant cost to the company in resources as well as monetary cost. The time involved to complete the due diligence as well as doing your day job is not to be underestimated. During the time of preparing the business, I was working as a fractional CFO, but during the most intensive part of the process I was effectively full-time for a couple of months. I would recommend if there is an option to get additional resource in during this time then do so.  That's why getting your house in order beforehand is so important.

Key takeaways for CFOs

  • Exit preparation starts years before a transaction:
    The most successful exits are rarely the result of last-minute preparation. CFOs play a critical role in building value long before a sale process begins by embedding strong financial controls, creating clear growth plans, reducing operational risk and ensuring the business can withstand external scrutiny.
  • Value creation extends beyond revenue and EBITDA:
    Investors and acquirers look beyond headline financial performance. Factors such as recurring revenue, customer concentration, cash generation, leadership depth and operational resilience often have a greater influence on valuation than growth alone. Modern CFOs must understand and actively manage these value drivers.
  • Due diligence rewards businesses with their house in order:
    The due diligence process is intensive and highly detailed. Clean data, robust financial records, documented processes can help reduce risk, avoid unnecessary challenges and ensure management teams remain focused on running the business throughout a transaction.
Continue the conversation

CFO Ladies Lunch

Date: September (date TBC)
Location: Central London.

Enquire now

Register your interest via the form on our contact page and we'll be in touch with further event details.

Book your free audit