Contact
Find us
- RCK Partners,
70 Gracechurch Street,
London,
EC3V 0HR.
© 2024 RCK Partners - Company House No: 12396021
.jpg)
Issue 3: CFOs have always played a key role in capital allocation. What is changing is the range of factors they must consider. Investment decisions increasingly require an understanding of technology, tax, talent, funding, regulation and risk. The modern CFO is therefore helping to determine not only what a business can afford, but where it should invest and what capabilities it will need for the future.


This is the third edition of The Modern CFO, following our previous discussions around the evolving role of the CFO in technology-led businesses and preparing a business for exit. Across those conversations, one theme has remained consistent: the CFO's influence now extends well beyond traditional finance, with finance leaders increasingly involved in shaping strategy, supporting growth and creating long-term value.
This month, we turn our attention to investment and innovation. CFOs have always played an important role in deciding how capital is allocated, but the decisions they face are becoming increasingly complex. Businesses are being asked to balance the opportunity for growth and innovation with uncertainty, risk and the need to deliver sustainable returns.
Throughout this issue, we hear from Former International CFO at Apple and McGraw-Hill, Raymond Yager, who has provided commentary on this subject. This issue explores how finance leaders approach investment decisions, balance risk and opportunity, and create the conditions for innovation to support sustainable growth.

The purpose of R&D Tax Relief is to influence business behaviour. It is intended to encourage companies to invest more in research and development than they otherwise would by reducing the cost and financial risk involved.
If changes to the value or reliability of the relief lead companies to reduce investment, recruit fewer technical staff or cancel projects, those outcomes need to be considered when assessing whether the scheme is working.
RCK Partners’ recent independent survey of 254 CFOs at R&D-active SMEs found that 62.2% had reduced their investment in R&D following recent changes to the relief. Around 35% had recruited fewer technical staff than planned and 20% had cancelled R&D projects.
For an SME, this might mean not recruiting another engineer, scaling back a technically difficult project or deciding against further development of a product that may never succeed. R&D Tax Relief can reduce the net cost of taking that risk and provide cash for further development. If the expected benefit falls, the company may delay the project, reduce its scope or decide that it cannot afford to proceed.
Tax relief can also affect whether development work is carried out in-house or outsourced to overseas contractors. These choices should be based mainly on commercial and technical requirements, but the tax treatment may change the relative cost of each approach.
For a larger international business, the question may be where to establish an engineering team or R&D facility. Other countries use R&D incentives to compete for investment, so the generosity and stability of the UK regime can affect whether internationally mobile R&D, and the skilled employment that comes with it, takes place here or elsewhere.
The rate of relief is only part of the calculation. More than 70% of respondents to our survey said that the time taken by HMRC to process and pay claims made the benefit too unreliable to include confidently in financial planning. If a CFO cannot predict when the cash will arrive, it becomes harder to decide how much of the project can be funded internally and how much may need to come from borrowing or external investment.
CFOs therefore need to consider the likely value, timing and eligibility of an R&D claim when planning investment, rather than waiting until the accounting period has ended. A regime designed to influence business behaviour can only do that if companies understand it and have sufficient confidence to plan around it.
.png)
Having held senior finance roles for more than three decades across some of the world's most innovative organisations, from global technology giants to venture-backed growth businesses, Raymond has seen first-hand how the CFO role has evolved. Today, as a Non-Executive Director and portfolio FD, he works closely with businesses of all sizes, helping leadership teams navigate investment, innovation and growth.
We spoke to Raymond about how CFOs are adapting to rapid technological change, managing investment risk, and the vital role of R&D tax relief in supporting innovation.
1. You have held senior finance roles in technology and innovation-led businesses for more than 30 years, from large multinationals to private equity venture-backed growth companies. How has the CFO’s involvement in investment decisions changed during that time?
In large organisations, investment decisions are typically driven less by questions of affordability and more by whether an initiative will work and if it will create ultimate added value. Large businesses have access to extensive data, market research, and sophisticated forecasting tools that help reduce uncertainty and support decision-making. They go through quite a rigid internal process in collaboration with various departments across the organisation to convince and prove stakeholders that this is worth doing. This differs usually greatly for SMEs, where in these businesses cash flow is typically more limited and continuous fundraising is often needed for even basic survival in which leaders are constantly balancing growth opportunities against the reality of their limited resources. For SMEs, R&D tax credits, cancredits can therefore make the difference between a project being funded or not.
In today’s world, I believe the CFO cannot afford to sit on the side lines as perhaps in the past as far as understanding the technology needing to be more fluent in the “language of innovation” and be able to engage with technical teams as their equals. Finance expertise remains important of course, but today's CFO must look to be skilled far beyond finance and feel more competent when evaluating returns on technology investments.
2. When a business is considering significant investment in a new technology or product where the eventual return is difficult to forecast reliably, how should the CFO decide whether the investment should proceed and manage the financial risk involved?
One of the biggest mistakes any businesses can make is to assume a certain level of certainty and precision in forecasting for the purposes of deriving an ROI. Investments in innovation are by their very nature are always going to be difficult to predict outcomes.
During my time in tech driven companies, I have also seen first-hand innovations which are developed long before the market was truly ready for them. I have learnt that exciting innovation in itself does not of course guarantee a clear commercially viable opportunity and for that reason I tend to adopt more and more wherever possible the following approach to help minimise that potential risk
Firstly, we try and break out the investment spend, if possible, into clearly defined milestones with funding being accordingly released according to n a step-by-step approach. At each stage, the business should be able to demonstrate that it has achieved specific pre-determined objectives before moving forward on and committing any further funding. This infers that investment spend should be minimised as much as possible in each and every stage to mitigate against the possibility of overspending at any point in time.
Secondly, implement a formal risk management process from the very outset of the project. I have always encouraged businesses to maintain a highly detailed risk register that identifies everything and anything that could possibly go wrong. The CFO should act as the real conscience of the organisation, establishing risk mitigation measures at all times and ensuring that thorough research and validation testing has been fully considered at each and every stage.
As we all also know businesses consistently underestimate costs and overestimate revenues, so it is the role of the CFO to always challenge the underlying assumptions. In the world of AI, it is even more important than ever to capture the expected costs of the entire project knowing the increasing expenses of cloud infrastructure, data centres and hiring of highly specialised talent.
3. Looking ahead, how do you expect the CFO’s role to evolve as technology, AI and innovation become increasingly important to business strategy, and what skills, knowledge and relationships will CFOs need to influence those decisions effectively?
Technology is fundamentally and rapidly reshaping the way businesses today operate and manage their expenses. For decades, labour was often the largest item on the P&L but iIncreasingly, we are seeing technology and IT spend becoming by far one of the most significant costs which is only likely to continue as AI adoption accelerates. There will be an increasing trade off between labour efficiencies and growing IT related spend.
Organisations will need the capital to invest, and SMEs in particular may find it increasingly difficult to compete for access to the best tools and platforms. CFOs will also need to have an understanding of these tools for their own finance team deployment to maximise internal efficiency gains. The pace of change means CFOs need to keep up with the latest technologies more than ever in the past and be able to adapt quickly to gain new efficiencies as well as identify inherent risks in the company’s overall strategies. CFOs will need to help weigh up the need to gain competitive advantage and the likely increasing cost of IT investment – a delicate balance!
4. Our recent survey found that 62.2% of R&D-active SMEs had reduced their investment in R&D following changes to R&D Tax Relief. In your experience, to what extent can the availability and reliability of tax relief affect whether a project proceeds, as well as how it is funded?
Across almost every organisation I have worked with, from start-ups to multinational corporations, the positive impacts of claiming R&D tax credits from the Government were plain to see. SMEs in particular often rely on these incentives as an essential source of funding as a result need to hire a professional firm with the necessary expertise to manage the process from identifying the core innovation to writing up a critical technical report for validation by HMRC .In my view that process should start as soon as possible even within the year of claim as it is important to identify early the key elements of innovation to determine whether it fully meets the strict qualification criteria.
Assess investment beyond ROI: Consider how investment will improve productivity, resilience, competitive differentiation and long-term value, rather than relying solely on financial returns.
Fund innovation in stages: Break larger investments into defined milestones, releasing further funding when agreed objectives have been met. This can help control spend and manage the inherent uncertainty around innovation.
Challenge assumptions and risk early: Build risk management into investment decisions from the outset, testing assumptions around costs, revenues and commercial viability, particularly for AI and technology projects where infrastructure and specialist talent can significantly affect costs.
Factor funding and tax into investment planning: Consider the potential value, timing and eligibility of R&D tax relief before committing capital. For SMEs especially, the availability and reliability of this support can influence whether projects proceed and how they are funded.

CFO Ladies Lunch
Date: September (date TBC)
Location: Central London.
Register your interest via the form on our contact page and we'll be in touch with further event details.
© 2024 RCK Partners - Company House No: 12396021
Commentary from RCK Partners Innovation Advisory Council
The CFO has always played an active role in budget allocation. Today's investment decisions made by the modern CFO are rarely confined to financial considerations alone. Whether evaluating a new technology platform, entering a new market, funding innovation programmes or investing in talent, CFOs must increasingly balance a wide range of factors, including tax policy, regulation, funding availability, skills requirements and long-term strategic objectives. The question is no longer simply, "Can we afford this?" but rather, "Is this where we should invest to create long-term value?"
Practically, this requires a more holistic approach to capital allocation, with investments assessed not only on financial returns but also on their ability to improve productivity, strengthen resilience, create differentiation and support long-term value creation.
This shift is evident in the way businesses are responding to changes in the wider investment landscape. Recent research conducted by RCK Partners found that 62.2% of CFOs and finance leaders reduced their R&D investment following reforms to the UK's R&D tax relief scheme. The findings highlight how closely investment decisions are linked to policy and funding certainty. While businesses cannot control external conditions, CFOs must understand how to navigate them, ensuring they maximise available support while maintaining confidence in their longer-term investment strategy.
Looking ahead, I'd suggest that successful CFOs will be those who adopt a portfolio approach to investment. Rather than concentrating resources in a small number of large initiatives, finance leaders should seek an appropriate balance between investing in immediate performance, operational improvements and future growth opportunities. This includes creating capacity for experimentation, investing in emerging technologies such as AI, and ensuring organisations have the skills and capabilities needed to capitalise on future opportunities.